Lacey Township Board of Education v. Lacey Township Education Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Lacey Township Board of Education v. Lacey Township Education Ass'n, 130 N.J. 312 (N.J. 1992)
613 A.2d 1162; 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1047; 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639
Affirmance, Clifford, Garibaldi, Handler, Hern, Pollock, Reversal, Stein, Wilentz

Lacey Township Board of Education v. Lacey Township Education Ass'n

Dissenting Opinion

POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio’s dissenting opinion, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 400, 613 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5. For reversal — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).

Reference

Full Case Name
LACEY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION v. LACEY TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Status
Published