Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992

Lacey Township Board of Education v. Lacey Township Education Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 20, 1992 · Affirmance, Clifford, Garibaldi, Handler, Hern, Pollock, Reversal, Stein, Wilentz

130 N.J. 312; 613 A.2d 1162; 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1047; 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639

Dissenting Opinion

POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio’s dissenting opinion, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 400, 613 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5. For reversal — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.