State v. Whyte

Supreme Court of New Jersey August 2, 1993

State v. Whyte, 628 A.2d 287 (N.J. 1993)

133 N.J. 481; 1993 N.J. LEXIS 740

Wilentz

Dissenting Opinion

WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s dissenting opinion, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

*482For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O’HERN and STEIN-4

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

Reference

Full Case Name: State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arturo R. Whyte, Defendant-Respondent; State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fitz G. Byfield, Defendant-Respondent; State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barrington Aird, Defendant-Respondent
Cited By: 11 cases
Status: Published