State v. Whyte
State v. Whyte
628 A.2d 287; 133 N.J. 481; 1993 N.J. LEXIS 740
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Whyte
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s dissenting opinion, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.