Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
131 N.J. 110; 618 A.2d 348; 1993 N.J. LEXIS 22
Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J.Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352 (1992).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.