State v. Baker
Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Baker, 648 A.2d 1127 (N.J. 1994)
138 N.J. 89; 1994 N.J. LEXIS 861
O'Hern
State v. Baker
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 79, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.
For reversal — Justice O’HERN — 1.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 55, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James Baker, Defendant-Appellant
- Cited By
- 31 cases
- Status
- Published