State v. Baker
State v. Baker
648 A.2d 1127; 138 N.J. 89; 1994 N.J. LEXIS 861
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Baker
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 79, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.
For reversal — Justice O’HERN — 1.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 270 N.J.Super. 55, 636 A.2d 553 (1994).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.