Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois, 667 A.2d 188 (N.J. 1995)
142 N.J. 570; 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1358
Coleman

Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois

Dissenting Opinion

STEIN and COLEMAN, Justices,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI-5.

For reversal — Justices STEIN and COLEMAN-2.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).

Reference

Full Case Name
Nancy Strube, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois (t.I.L.) Individually and D/B/A the Travelers Companies, Webster M. Grimm and C.I.A.P.N.J., Defendants-Respondents
Cited By
15 cases
Status
Published