Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois
Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois
667 A.2d 188; 142 N.J. 570; 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1358
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Strube v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI-5.
For reversal — Justices STEIN and COLEMAN-2.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.