In re Hartmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey
In re Hartmann, 142 N.J. 587 (N.J. 1995)
667 A.2d 669; 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1646

In re Hartmann

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on September 19, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOHN A. HART-MANN, III, of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1969, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), RPC 3.5(c) (engaging in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal) and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN A. HARTMANN, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*588ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Reference

Full Case Name
IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. HARTMANN, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
Status
Published