Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995

In re Rushfield

In re Rushfield
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 4, 1995
142 N.J. 617; 667 A.2d 684; 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1386

In re Rushfield

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on August 23,1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK C. RUSH-FIELD of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded on the basis of a guilty plea to a three-count federal information charging respondent with violating the ERISA-reporting provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1023 and § 1024, misdemeanor offenses under 29 U.S.C. § 1131, and respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

*618It is ORDERED that MARK C. RUSHFIELD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.