Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS, 676 A.2d 1065 (N.J. 1996)
144 N.J. 326; 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1223
Per Curiam
Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 448, 650 A.2d 1 (1994). We add that the coverage afforded under the policy is limited to the statutory coverage required by N.J.S.A 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A 39:6B-1 in accordance with the holding in Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association, 144 N.J. 325, 676 A.2d 1064 (1996), also decided today.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Christine Dillard, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Hertz Claim Management and/or Eds Systems, as Servicing Agent for the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association (Njafiua), Defendants, and New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association (Njafiua), Defendant-Appellant
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published