Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996

In re Carracino

In re Carracino
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 19, 1996
143 N.J. 140; 669 A.2d 816; 1996 N.J. LEXIS 22

In re Carracino

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on September 11, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that ANTHONY F. CARRACINO of FORDS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), RPC 4.1(a) (making a false statement of fact), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and said ANTHONY F. CARRACINO having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY F. CARRACINO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

*141ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.