Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n, 144 N.J. 325 (N.J. 1996)
676 A.2d 1064; 1996 N.J. LEXIS 782

Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J.Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
CONCETTA MAROTTA v. NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ITS SERVICING CARRIER LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ITS SERVICING CARRIER, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. ANTHONY J. MAROTTA CONCETTA MAROTTA INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A CRUM & FORSTER PERSONAL INSURANCE), AND THE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. (A/K/A FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANIES), AND JACK BERK AND EILEEN BERK
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published