Walsh v. State
Walsh v. State
689 A.2d 131; 147 N.J. 595; 1997 N.J. LEXIS 71
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- Golden v. County of Union (N.J. 2000)
- Troy v. Rutgers (N.J. 2001)
- Merlino v. Borough of Midland Park (N.J. 2002)
- Allen v. Fauver (N.J. 2001)
- In re City of Newark (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
- State v. Davis (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2004)
- Crane v. Yurick (District Court, D. New Jersey 2003)
- Jordan v. Solomon (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2003)
- Coyle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders (N.J. 2002)
- State v. INTERN. FED., LOCAL (N.J. 2001)
- Miskowitz v. Union County Utilities Authority (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
- State v. International Federation of Professional & Engineers, Local 195 (N.J. 2001)
- DiPaolo v. PASSAIC BD. FREEHOLDERS (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications Workers (N.J. 1998)
- In re Baykal (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
- Golden v. County of Union (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
- Cooper v. Mayor (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
- ANTHONY P. FALCO, SR. VS. DAWN ZIMMER (L-0369-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021)
- Jordan v. Solomon (District Court, D. New Jersey 2001)
- Cedeno v. MONTCLAIR STATE UNV. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s dissenting opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 290 N.J.Super. 13, 674 A.2d 988 (1996).
For reversal — -Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.