In re Hamilton

Supreme Court of New Jersey
In re Hamilton, 147 N.J. 459 (N.J. 1997)
688 A.2d 582; 1997 N.J. LEXIS 52

In re Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

.ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 10, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DAVID R. *460HAMILTON of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter); and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID R. HAMILTON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Reference

Full Case Name
IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. HAMILTON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
Status
Published