In re Dow
In re Dow
Opinion of the Court
This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule l:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of JAMES E. DOW, JR. of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972;
And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 failure to communicate); and RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest);
And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated RPC 1.3; RPC 1.4; and RPC 1.7 and that said conduct warrants a reprimand;
And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule l:20-10(b)(3) to determine the appropriate measure of discipline for respondent’s misconduct;
And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that JAMES E. DOW, JR. is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- IN THE MATTER OF JAMES E. DOW, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
- Status
- Published