Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999

Nash v. Lerner

Nash v. Lerner
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 17, 1999 · Pollock
157 N.J. 535; 724 A.2d 798; 1999 N.J. LEXIS 81

Nash v. Lerner

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

POLLOCK, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s majority opinion, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.