Nash v. Lerner

Supreme Court of New Jersey March 17, 1999

Nash v. Lerner, 157 N.J. 535 (N.J. 1999)

724 A.2d 798; 1999 N.J. LEXIS 81

Pollock

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

POLLOCK, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s majority opinion, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.

Reference

Full Case Name: AMELIA NASH AND FRED NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. BELLA LERNER, AND JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, AND RICHARD ROES
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published