Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000

In Re Rovner, Allen, Seiken & Rovner

In Re Rovner, Allen, Seiken & Rovner
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided July 19, 2000
754 A.2d 554; 164 N.J. 617; 2000 N.J. LEXIS 998 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Rovner, Allen, Seiken & Rovner

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that the law firm of ROVNER, ALLEN, SEIKEN & ROVNER of CHERRY HILL, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 5.1(b) (failure to supervise attorneys), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the law firm of ROVNER, ALLEN, SEIKEN & ROVNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as maintained within this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.