State v. Padilla
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision. The 9 that cite it most often are listed here.
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TEOSHIE WILLIAMS (14-09-0992, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- State of New Jersey v. M.A.B. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SAQUAN J. WEAVER (18-09-1504, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. K.D.C. (15-09-1224 AND 16-04-0547, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2020)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AMIR H. JEFFERSON (14-04-0413, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTHONY L. CONCEPCION (15-02-0184, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
- State v. Hummel (N.J. 2018)
- State of New Jersey v. James L. Legette (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2015)
- State v. Pineiro (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This matter has come to the Supreme Court through different procedural avenues. The Court denied defendants’ petitions for certification, which related to the unanimous portion of the Appellate Division’s judgment. 162 N.J. 198, 743 A.2d 850 (1999). Based on the partial dissent -filed in the Appellate Division and reported at 321 N.J.Super. at 112, 728 A.2d 279 (1999), the State filed an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1 (a)(2). In respect of that appeal, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kleiner’s majority opinion, reported at 321 N.J.Super. 96, 728 A.2d 279 (1999).
*4 For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.
Opposed — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.