Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000

In re Hintze

In re Hintze
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided July 12, 2000
164 N.J. 548; 753 A.2d 1146; 2000 N.J. LEXIS 794

In re Hintze

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that KIMBERLY A. HINTZE, a/k/a KIMBERLY HINTZE-WILCE, of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), *549RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities);

And respondent having been ordered to show cause why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KIMBERLY A. HINTZE, a/k/a KIMBERLY HINTZE-WILCE, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent enroll in the next offering of the legal education course of the Ethics Diversionary Program offered by the New Jersey State Bar Association; and it is further

' ORDERED that respondent practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.