Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
- Price v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Sarah J. MORTARA and Angelo J. Mortara, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Michael L. Testa, Vineland, argued the cause for appellants (Basile & Testa, attorneys; Walter A. Schultz, Jr., on the brief).
Gerard W. Quinn, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys).
Salvatore A. Alessi, Barrington, argued the cause for respondent Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Mr. Alessi, attorney; Melville D. Lide, Vineland, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).
For affirmingChief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI6.
OpposedNone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.