Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes
Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes
Opinion
Raymond VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Leigh E. RZASA-ORMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, Newark and Schepisi & McLaughlin, Englewood Cliffs, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, Newark, John A. Schepisi, Englewood Cliffs and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).
Steven R. Klein, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).
David G. Evans, Pittstown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).
For affirmanceChief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS7.
OpposedNone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.