Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2009

In Re Austin

In Re Austin
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 6, 2009
969 A.2d 1121; 198 N.J. 599 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Austin

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-309, concluding that CHARLES E. AUSTIN of ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES E. AUSTIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.