Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010

In the Matter of Hediger

In the Matter of Hediger
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided July 19, 2010
997 A.2d 225; 202 N.J. 336 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In the Matter of Hediger

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB-10-054, concluding that DANIEL DAVID HEDIGER of EDGEWATER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence);

And the Disciplinary Review Boai’d further concluded that respondent should continue to practice under the supervision of a *337 practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics as ordered by the Court on July 17, 2007;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL DAVID HEDIGER is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Commit tee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.