Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011

In Re Prothro

In Re Prothro
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 5, 2011
27 A.3d 1210; 208 N.J. 340; 2011 N.J. LEXIS 945 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In Re Prothro

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-061, concluding that PHILIP C. PROTHRO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be disciplined for violating RPC 8.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP C. PROTHRO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.