In re Prothro
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Hyderally (N.J. 2011)
- In re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (N.J. 2025)
- In re Brekus (N.J. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-061, concluding that PHILIP C. PROTHRO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be disciplined for violating RPC 8.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);
And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that PHILIP C. PROTHRO is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.