Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011

In RE DeSENO

In RE DeSENO
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 9, 2011
13 A.3d 357; 205 N.J. 91; 2011 N.J. LEXIS 314 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In RE DeSENO

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-247, concluding that THOMAS DeSENO of *92 TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS DeSENO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.