Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011

In RE DeSENO

In RE DeSENO
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 9, 2011
13 A.3d 357; 205 N.J. 91; 2011 N.J. LEXIS 314 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
In RE DeSENO

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-247, concluding that THOMAS DeSENO of *92 TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS DeSENO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.