Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011

In the Matter of Mulder

In the Matter of Mulder
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 15, 2011
12 A.3d 205; 205 N.J. 71; 2011 N.J. LEXIS 220 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In the Matter of Mulder

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-212, concluding that WILLIAM H. MULDER of SADDLEBROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (misrepresentation of material fact to a third person), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM H. MULDER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *72 expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.