Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012

In re Kane

In re Kane
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 6, 2012
212 N.J. 476; 56 A.3d 865; 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1260

In re Kane

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-120, concluding that THOMAS KANE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, *477should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(g) (threatening criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS KANE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.