Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson, 224 N.J. 278 (N.J. 2016)
132 A.3d 422; 2016 N.J. LEXIS 287

Berman, Sauter, Record & Jardim, P.C. v. Robinson

Opinion of the Court

The Court having granted appellants’ petition for certification; and having reviewed the briefs and heard argument of the parties; and the Court having determined that the trial judge was not precluded by Rule 1:12-1 or the Code of Judicial Conduct from presiding over this matter; and further the Superior Court, Appellate Division, having ruled on that issue sua sponte without notice to the parties and an opportunity to be heard (see Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of City of Elizabeth, 224 N.J. 126, 129 A.3d 1032 (2016)); and the Court having determined that this appeal can be disposed of summarily; it is therefore

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the matter is remanded to that court to *279address the substantive arguments of the parties on the merits. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Reference

Full Case Name
BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, P.C., F/K/A RAMSEY BERMAN, P.C. v. ART ROBINSON AOR HOLDINGS, INC., AND DTH15, LLC, DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. HERSH, RAMSEY & BERMAN, P.C., THIRD-PARTY AND J. DAVID RAMSEY, ESQ. AND EDWARD A. BERMAN, ESQ., THIRD-PARTY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published