Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Bardis v. Stinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Bardis v. Stinson, 224 N.J. 448 (N.J. 2016)
134 A.3d 27; 2016 N.J. LEXIS 334
Albin, Cuff, Fernandez, Lavecchia, Patterson, Rabner, Reversal, Solomon, Temporarily, Vina

Bardis v. Stinson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the Law Division’s judgment is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Sapp-Peterson’s dissenting opinion, reported at 444 N.J.Super. 227, 240, 132 A.3d 930 (App.Div. 2014) (Sapp-Peterson, P.J.A.D., dissenting).

For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 6. Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA.

Reference

Full Case Name
ALEXANDER BARDIS AND MONICA BARDIS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. KITTY STINSON AND STINSON CLAIMS SERVICES, AND CUMBERLAND INSURANCE GROUP
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑