State v. Gonzalez
State v. Gonzalez
226 N.J. 209; 141 A.3d 294
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- State of New Jersey v. Ebenezer Byrd, Jerry J. Spraulding, and Gregory A. Jean-Baptiste (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2024)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL CAWLEY (08-12-2127, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. IBILOLA IGHAMA-AMEGOR A-0374-17T1 (14-06-0082, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2020)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STEVEN P. RINCK (13-02-0373, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
The Court agrees with the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the use of “and/or” in the jury instruction in this case injected ambiguity into the charge. See State v. Gonzalez, 444 N.J.Super. 62, 75-76, 130 A.3d 1250 (App.Div. 2016). The criticism of the use of “and/or” is limited to the circumstances in which it was used in this case. Id. at 71-72, 130 A.3d 1250.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.