Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2017

In re Registrant A.D.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 7, 2017 · Albin, Fernandez, Lavecchia, Patterson, Rabner, Solomon, Timpone, Vina

227 N.J. 626; 153 A.3d 241; 2017 N.J. LEXIS 155

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Registrant S.O. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL ROCHAT (13-07-1002, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2022)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. R.I. (92-04-0543, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT H.D. IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT J.M. (ML-98-07-0091 AND ML-98-17-0002, ESSEX COUNTY, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.H. IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT G.A. (ML-00200521, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE, AND ML-07130018, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED) (CONSOLIDATED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
In re G.H. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)
In re H.D. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Nugent’s opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 441 N.J.Super. 403, 119 A.3d 241 (App. Div. 2015).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and TIMPONE join in this opinion. JUSTICE SOLOMON did not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.