State v. Vasco

Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Vasco, 195 A.3d 839 (N.J. 2018)
235 N.J. 365

State v. Vasco

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

**365The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Espinosa's dissenting opinion, reported at **366--- N.J. Super. ----, ----, --- A.3d ----, 2017 WL 10445742 (App. Div. 2017) (Espinosa, J.A.D., dissenting). Defendant's guilty plea is vacated and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Rainlin VASCO
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published