Sipko v. Roger, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sipko v. Roger, Inc., 206 A.3d 955 (N.J. 2019)
237 N.J. 558
Sipko v. Roger, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
It is ORDERED that the motions for an extension of time to file an answer in opposition to the motion to dismiss (M-950) and for leave to deem the previously submitted notice of petition for certification and petition for certification as a timely motion for leave to appeal (M-952) are granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the previously submitted notice of petition for certification (C-820) is thereby rendered moot, this matter proceeding instead as a motion for leave to appeal pursuant to M-952; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-989) is denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants, and Rastislav Sipko
- Status
- Published