City of Newark v. Hahne & Co.
Opinion of the Court
The City of Newark assessed the personal property of the respondent company for taxation for the year 1939, at $900,000. This was reduced to $814,200 by the Essex County Board of Taxation, and the city appeals to restore the assessment as made. Both sides adduced testimony purportedly probative of the true value of the accounts receivable, stock in trade, and furniture and fixtures of the department store business conducted by respondent, as of October 1st, 1938.
Respondent's personal property tax return, filed with the city's assessors for the year 1939, shows accounts receivable of a true value of $655,296.35 and a total of inventory and
The statutory requirements set out in section 54:4-15 must be strictly complied with, and substantial compliance is insufficient. Household Finance Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1941), 126 N. J. L. 399; Household Finance Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 Id. 230. Neither of the designations made by respondent states precisely when the obligation referred to was incurred. “Prior to October 1st, 1933,” could mean a week, a month, or a year prior to that date. “About October 31st, 1935,” is similarly vague and indefinite. Neither of the debts may be deducted, because of non-compliance with the statute. It results that the assessment must be restored to the original figures fixed by the city assessors.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.