Hullman v. Christopher
Opinion of the Court
The above matter coming on for hearing, and having been submitted to me for decision, I hereby find and determine as follows:
1. That this is a proceeding brought by August Hullman and against the above-named respondent, A. J. Christopher,
2. That the petitioner1 was employed by the respondent as a rigger on or about the' 1st day of April, 1924, and that lie continued in such employment up to the'21st day of April, 1924; that his duties consisted of working pus a rigger.
3. That the petitioner at the time of the injury received for Iris services wages amounting to $36 per week.
-1. That the respondent had actual knowledge of the occurrence of the said injury.
•5. That as a result the petitioner received injury, causing the petitioner a permanent disability of sixty-five per cent., which lasted for a period of one hundred and twenty-seven and one-half weeks at the rate of $17 per week.
6. I find, therefore, that the petitioner is entitled to com pensaiion for a period of one hundred and twenty-seven and one-half weeks, or eighty-five per cent, permanent disability at the rate of $17 per week.
7. That the legal adviser of the petitioner is entitled io compensation in the sum of $200, to be assessed against petitioner, and $10 for stenographic fees, to he assessed against the respondent.
A Costs will he allowed the petitioner.
William B. McMichael,
Referee, ~Worlcmeris Compensation Bureau.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.