Le Grande ex rel. Le Grande v. Hubbard & Lange
Opinion of the Court
% * * # ifc * ❖
On or before the 25th day of January, 1927, the said Horace R. Le Grande was employed by the respondents Hubbard &
The floor of the boiler room in which decedent was working was from three to four feet below the floor of the building and was about fifteen feet in length by twelve feet in width, and twelve or fourteen feet in height. There were two boilers in the room, only one of which, however, was in operation on the morning of January 25th, 1927. There were two windows in the boiler room, both of which were closed, and one door, which was closed from time to time. To install the trap, it was necessary for Le Grande to go up on a ladder and to work near the ceiling. The steam trap was in front of the boiler, which was in operation and about five or six feet away. The door of the boiler which was in operation was opened several times to admit coal, and one witness testified it was open for fifteen minutes while Le Grande was engaged in installing the steam trap. When he had been working on the ladder for about fifteen minutes, he came down the ladder slowly and acted “dopey,” as the witnesses describe it. He sat down for a few minutes and again went up the ladder. After working there for a few minutes he came down and said to his helper, Walter McManus: “You go up there, I can’t stand it any longer.” As he came down the ladder for the second time he still acted “dopey,” and sat in the boiler room for a few minutes; all witnesses agreed that he acted dopey and that he appeared to be weak. He was then taken home by a workman who said that he'was just able to walk.
On the afternoon of January 25th, 1927, Dr. Henry Haywood was called and found Le Grande in bed and suffering from a headache and soreness in the chest. He was in a state
OPINION.
In considering whether Le Grande sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, not much reliance can be put upon the testimony of the witness Walter McManus, so far as relates to the presence or absence of coal gas in the boiler room on the morning of January 25th, although his testimony in this connection was somewhat self-contradictory, I am not disposed to disregard his testimony in tolo; it appears beyond contradiction, however, that on the morning in question the door of the boiler which was in operation was opened several times to admit coal, while Le Grande was engaged in installing the steam trap, McManus testifying the door remained open for about fifteen minutes. It is also uncontradicted that the boiler had not been completely covered with asbestos; that merely the seams of the boiler had been filled in and that a few days after Le Grande left the shop flames appeared through the seams at several points. It will be remembered that the boiler had been in operation during the preceding night. It is common knowledge that
The testimony was convincing that Le Grande appeared to be in good health before he went up the ladder to install the steam trap. He worked on the ladder but a few minutes when he came down slowly acting weak and “dopey.” After a short rest, he again went up the ladder for a period of about fifteen minutes, when he came down and said to his helper: “I can’t stand it up there any longer, you go up.” Thereafter, he sat in the boiler room for a few minutes, acting weak and “dopey,” as the witnesses testified. On the afternoon of the same day he was so weak that Dr. Haywood was called. Le Grande told the doctor that he had inhaled furnace fumes which had made him sick. The doctor found no sign of anything wrong with the man’s lungs at that time. The man had a headache and there was a soreness about the chest. Eorty-eight hours later, upon examination, there was no sign of any pulmonary trouble. The doctor’s testimony is clear and uncontradicted, that in his opinion the pneumonia from which Le Grande subsequently died was induced by inhalation of the furnace fumes. The preponderance of the testimony constrains me to find that Le Grande was exposed to furnace fumes which were the original cause of the pneumonia from which he later died. I do therefore find that he sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.
# ❖ ❖ # # #
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.