Sprague v. Schultz Vegetable Oil Co.
Opinion of the Court
H» »5* i' »*•
Petitioner alleges that he sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent on •September 16th, 1927. He says that at that time he was employed by the respondent as a millwright, and while so engaged lost his balance while attempting to throw on a belt and was thrown or fell to the brick floor some distance below, striking his nose, face and left wrist. He alleges that as a result of the said accident he sustained serious and permanent injury. He alleges that he received injuries consisting of a fracture and displacement of the bones of the left wrist, facial injuries, and that he suffers from dizziness, vertigo, headaches, impairment of function of nose, stoppage of breathing through nose, loss of sense of smell and consequent loss of appetite; impairment of vision, head and brain injuries as well as central nervous disturbances. The petitioner claims very serious total permanent disability.
Respondent denies that the dizziness, vertigo, impairment of vision, head and brain injuries, as well as central nervous disturbances, conditions of the petitioner, are the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the respondent, but the respondent takes all injuries,
From the testimony and the facts stipulated, the settlement is fair to both sides and is approved by this court upon the distinct understanding of the petitioner and his attorney and the respondent and its attorneys that a fundamental element ®f the settlement is the fact that any future or further disturbances resulting in an increase of disability to the petitioner are taken into consideration and are in a large measure the reason for the respondent’s willingness to agree to this settlement.
% i’fi ^ ¡¡<
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.