State v. Mundzak
State v. Mundzak
85 N.M. 79; 509 P.2d 271
State v. Mundzak
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Following a plea of guilty, the defendant was sentenced for attempting to distribute a controlled substance (LSD). See §§ 40A-28-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6) and 54-11-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (Int.Supp. 1972).
On this appeal, defendant contends that the judgment and sentence imposed are invalid because he did not understandingly and voluntarily enter his plea of guilty.
The record discloses nothing to support defendant’s contention.
Affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.