Baca v. Karsten Homes
Baca v. Karsten Homes
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MELINDA BACA, 8 Worker-Appellant, v. No. 29,727 KARSTEN HOMES and FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
13 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge
15 Chavez Law Offices Gene N. Chavez Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Doughty & West Judd C. West Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Bustamante, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 Affirmed.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.