New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009

Baca v. Karsten Homes

Baca v. Karsten Homes
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided December 21, 2009

Baca v. Karsten Homes

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MELINDA BACA, 8 Worker-Appellant, v. No. 29,727 KARSTEN HOMES and FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.

13 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge

15 Chavez Law Offices Gene N. Chavez Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Doughty & West Judd C. West Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Bustamante, Judge.

3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

6 Affirmed.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.