Hobbs v. Galavez
Hobbs v. Galavez
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO CITY OF HOBBS, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 29,487 JEFFREY GALAVEZ, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Don Maddox, District Judge City of Hobbs Gwen R. Gist, Staff Attorney Hobbs, NM for Appellee Fredlund, Bryan & Castillo W. Gilbert Bryan Hobbs, NM for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 ________________________________ 8 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:
10 ________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
12 ________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.