Davidson v. Kurucz
Davidson v. Kurucz
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 WILLIAM E. DAVIDSON and SHARYN N. DAVIDSON, 9 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NO. 29,586 ROGER J. KURUCZ, individually, and as Trustee of the ROGER J. KURUCZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, 14 Defendant-Appellee.
15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Ted Baca, District Judge Albuquerque Advocates, P.C.
18 Darryl W. Millet Albuquerque, NM for Appellants Law Offices of Segal & Whittaker, LLP Jeannette Martinez Whittaker Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 Affirmed.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 _______________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
13 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.