Romero v. Alires
Romero v. Alires
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO PAMELA ROMERO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 29,527 LARRY ALIRES, 11 Defendant-Appellant, v. ERNESTO ROMERO, 14 Third-Party Defendant.
15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge Nancy Ann Richards Las Vegas, NM for Appellee Larry Alires Las Vegas, NM Pro Se Appellant 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 Affirmed.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:
11 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
13 _______________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.