State v. Roybal
State v. Roybal
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 29,289 CHRISTOPHER ROYBAL, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY Drew D. Tatum, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Nettie M. Griffin, Esq.
18 Portales, NM for Appellant 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
22 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
2 AFFIRMED.
3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 ___________________________________ 5 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge WE CONCUR:
7 ___________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
9 ___________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.