1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO REYNOLDO “RONNIE” ANAYA, 9 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 29,414 RINKER MATERIALS and CRAWFORD INSURANCE CO., 13 Employer/Insurer-Appellee.

14 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge Chavez Law Offices Gene N. Chavez Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Hatch, Allen & Shepherd Kimberly A. Syra Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 AFFIRMED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge