New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009

Warren v. Boothby

Warren v. Boothby
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided August 27, 2009

Warren v. Boothby

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MICHELLE M. WARREN, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 29,290 LEO BOOTHBY, Individually; ALAN H. MAESTAS, Individually; and MAESTAS & BOOTHBY, a professional corporation, 14 Defendants-Appellees.

15 and SAMUEL M. HERRERA, 17 Deponent-Appellant.

18 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge Stephanie M. Zorie Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Warren Jonathan Hull Taos, NM for Appellees Lee Boothby, Alan Maestas, and Maestas & Boothby Samuel Herrera Taos, NM for Appellant 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

6 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

9 DISMISSED.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 _______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

14 ________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

16 ________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.