M Brown v. S Moya
M Brown v. S Moya
Opinion
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MARVIN BROWN, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 29,190 STANLEY MOYA, JAMES LOPEZ DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, CARLOS VALDEZ, DAVID VIGIL, RAY TRUJILLO, T.H. HAMMONTRE, CELESTE V. CASIAS, MIKE FLORES, KEM HEULSKAMP, and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 11 Defendants-Appellees.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge Marvin Brown Santa Fe, NM Pro Se Appellant Jim Brewster, General Counsel Diana J. Harris, Deputy General Counsel Santa Fe, NM for Appellees
21 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
23 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
3 AFFIRMED.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 ___________________________________ 6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 ___________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
10 ___________________________ ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.