New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009

J Quirno v. F Wilson

J Quirno v. F Wilson
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2009

J Quirno v. F Wilson

Opinion

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO JOSE E. CASTRO QUIRINO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 29,363 FRANK WILSON, et al., 6 Defendants-Appellees.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Don Maddox, District Judge Jose E. Castro Quirino Clayton, NM Pro Se Appellant Rosner & Chavez, LLC Frank N. Chavez Las Cruces, NM for Appellees Trujillo, Wilson, Martinez & Stevens Marie Mattison Alamogordo, NM Pro Se Appellee 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

21 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

2 AFFIRMED.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 ________________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

7 ________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

9 ________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.