L Lopresto v. E Patterson
L Lopresto v. E Patterson
L Lopresto v. E Patterson
Opinion
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO EMILY PATTERSON, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, v. No. 28,848 LEN LOPRESTO, 6 Respondent-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Mike Murphy, District Judge Francisco Mario Ortiz Las Cruces, NM for Appellee Bates Law Firm Lloyd O. Bates, Jr. Las Cruces, NM for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
18 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
21 AFFIRMED.
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 __________________________________ 3 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
4 WE CONCUR:
5 _____________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
7 _____________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.