New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009

State v. S Madrid

State v. S Madrid
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 16, 2009

State v. S Madrid

Opinion

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 28,732 STEVEN ALEJO MADRID, 7 Defendant-Appellant.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DONA ANA COUNTY Mike Murphy, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jeffrey C. Lahann Las Cruces, NM for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.

18 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

21 AFFIRMED.

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 __________________________________ 3 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

7 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.